Press Release "community of interests flood protection" - Mr. Fehr defended the planning of sustainable new Wittichbrücke favors s a traffic control over the residential area in the floodplain without a doubt, this shopping center. Thus, an additional road and transport links to Braach to be set up also to the pond bottom. It is therefore presumptuous to say, was that this fact was not considered in the reflections on the new bridge. - the interpretation of the proposed new bridge, including trucks - bear market is a further indication that the supply logistics of the markets with heavy-duty conveyors of these traffic management is facilitated and encouraged.
- Mr. Fehr said in a circle Gazette last week that the bridge had nothing to do with the market. Last summer had been discussed with the investor. Whether you have then been no more talk, we do not comment at this point.
Mr. Fehr also said that only on 25 February at the Ministry because the bridge was.
- Immediately after his visit to Wiesbaden, he should have informed. Since when has the city internally already involved in engineering, about the mayor says nothing.
- Plans for new Wittichbrücke was kept secret from the public and also before the opposition in city council for too long a time.
- This still is only one answer - undemocratic and not proactive. To believe that citizens would tolerate this silence is a misconception.
- To each his Rotenburger has now become clear that this approach, a specific target pursued. The citizens and the opposition should by late information are ignored and no reasonable opportunity to have more influence this bridge and road project . The mayor was wrong. In a very short time the activities were focused initiatives and mobilize citizens. The indignation of the population, also party lines is great. In the city it rumbles huge.
- The people's representatives, who previously supported the mayor when the bridge project should have to make some thought.
- expresses Mr. Fehr is the case, a referendum tilts the construction of the Wittichbrücke, he and those responsible have to accept this as a Democrat.
- leaving Mr. Fehr is not in this statement. He points instead to the fact that the vote of a citizens' decision is valid for three years. The mayor leaves here, is whether this statement is only a legal notice.
- Many people now fear that that more should be said, so that after end of the period of three years shuffled the cards again. Citizens are become suspicious to law and not trust blindly responsible city fathers, who have supported these decisions. Therefore, hands off the Wittich.
- If the city is the home land of the family Wilfert buy anyway to further to create facts, it must be possible to hold the mayor that he has operated control waste.
- The mayor has been officially informed of the citizen initiatives that citizens' petition has been launched. He is therefore well advised in such a case, any other activities first set and waiting for the referendum.
- Mr. Fehr is also the possibility to stop the referendum, if the decisions to build the town of Rotenburg Wittichbrücke be withdrawn. wanted
syndicate flood
Elfriede Huth
0 comments:
Post a Comment