(Source: http://schildbuergerbruecke-rotenburg.blogspot.com/2008/06/meinung-zum-thema-behelfsbrcke-von.html # comments )
Anonymous :
I think Mr. Knierim has the newspaper article in the HNA 13.06.2008 probably misunderstood. For this it is that the temporary bridge that will run directly alongside the bridge of the town twinning, "a million € more expensive than the most expedient Wittich" will be. As the community of interests of citizens road but is considered so much on the welfare of our citizens and I would say that it might be good of all citizens, I say they should now work towards a much more determined for a temporary bridge in the Wittich. Just like in the newspaper article of 05.06.2008 showed it has also voted by a large majority on the Assembly of 03.06.2008 for a temporary bridge in the Wittich. For with this temporary bridge saves the state of Hesse finally 1 million euros that other citizens could come to good. Has the town of Rotenburg but the state of Hesse in the implementation of the bypass Lispenhausen still necessary and should not scare away with his church tower thinking. A little more foresight would be appropriate.
Breitbart : anonymous
Hello Sir,
it may be that Mr.. Knierim has lost in the numbers of the bridges. Nevertheless, it must be noted, other aspects, rather than just the statement "the Wittichbrücke is 1 million cheaper" to play from the HNA articles.
How about if we compare in an objective discussion of the overall costs of the various alternatives? What, for example by standing in the room 400 thousand euros for the Czech Wilfer land would not be leftovers in the consideration of the total cost? What about the then necessary, further expansion of civil road? Free of?
About the argument that the state of Hesse could be relieved at a lasting solution, we can discuss. This is not exactly your particular issue, because you belong to the seemingly cheaper, temporary bridge at Wittich.Trotzdem I would like this to record from supporters of the permanent solution again raised criticism.
I'm at the point that is of the opinion that one here, "the shirt should be closer than the pants." Rotenburg is first paralyzed similar financially Alsfeld, the land (and all citizens of Hesse, you want to be relieved), the town of Rotenburg is certainly not with any financial transfer payments come to the rescue. I think the city treasurer of the town of Rotenburg, this is perhaps not officially, just so I can sehen.Von agree with the argument of the UBR representative in the city parliament only who said that a permanent bridge would be good, but "even given too expensive", because every year about 100 million (the figures vary here, depending on the political direction) incurred in running costs would be.
greeting
Michael Breitbart
Anonymous:
a) seems temporary bridge to be a word they absichtlichnicht often use you möchten.Stehen to coordinate your interest group Citizens Street: YES to the temporary bridge Wittich , 03.06.2008! b) temporary bridge right through the downtown area residential costs 2.5 Euro millions + protection of residents c) temporary bridge Wittich 1.5 million euros and now? An easy math problem! Where do you live as a tax payer? End to the Rotenburg waste of public funds. In the absence of objective discussion approaches the dialogue ends here!
Breitbart : anonymous
Hello Mr. or Mrs.,
OK when the dialogue is over, I take the liberty won, almost in the monologue, she returns the comment.
a) I do not know how to get to the word temporary bridge that I do not intentionally want to use. In my previous post was about the comparison of different alternatives, which in my view insufficiently appraised total costs and the problems of allocating costs between rural and urban areas of permanent and temporary solution. But perhaps refute the following arguments on the amount of your disk immersion level, your accusation: ..... temporary bridge, temporary bridge, temporary bridge, temporary bridge, temporary bridge ;-)
b & c) the arithmetic task (simple addition) in itself is light, seems to be difficult for you to determine all the terms of the task, or where among other things, the issue raised by me before buying the site Wilfert? Costs for protection of residents and students to school in the case of the JGS Wittichlösung could well be listed as well.
Best thing about your comment is still the sentence "In the absence of objective discussion approaches the dialogue ends here!".
Let us leave the neutral observer our discussion, the decision who provided us an objective discussion of approaches and who is not.
good evening!
not likely to be continued ...
see also review and discussion here:
http://www.hna.de/rotenburgstart/00_20080613174142_CDU_bleibt_beim_klaren_Nein.html
My guess: "Anonymous" = "Rotenburg-girl" = wife of "Rotenburger_Jung :-)
0 comments:
Post a Comment