If not now, when? My excitement about the bold so soon dilapidated bridge, the bridge of the town twinning, including the re-exposure of the taxpayer is expected given way. We
Bridge residents sitting for many years in the front row. Our privileges consist primarily of:
permanent Ersschütterungen through the traffic and the consequent damage to the truss, reduction in property values, enormous health burden from traffic noise, fine dust and exhaust fumes during rush hour, the pigeon droppings and between each flood accumulated debris under the Fulda Bridge. All in all a quite high Loss of living and quality of life.
In view of the damaged bridges in the rest of the currently permitted tonnage of 30 tons actual weight is too high. That's obvious but just as local residents, because you constantly fluctuating ground under their feet. An alternative to these many small earthquakes would offer a speed limit of 30 km / h for heavy vehicles.
This bridge is now useless! It is already the thunder box for pigeons Rotenburg denigrated. Especially for children to play go health hazards from the pigeon droppings. A pigeon house for feral pigeons on a patch of green, as seen in other places would be a sensible solution.
was 40 years ago there was a deep cut in the history of our city. Centuries-old buildings - primarily in the New Town - was razed to the ground, destroying irreplaceable half-timbered houses. Certainly these changes Bausch was also due to the garrison town. To the spectacle of armored columns, year in year out on the bridge, the residents would like to do without.
letter from Mr. Samsen (HNA, issue of 6/28/2008), I am very impressed. It is time, once the first question concerned - the man with his feelings and desires, concerns, needs, legitimate interests. Sorry, but from the administration ever more from the individual - and as we know, this takes revenge at the appropriate time. Apparently successfully engaged the citizens against a planned controversial building project has been able to defend themselves.
We know local residents and preservationists bridge first-hand about the problem of the occurrence. We now have enough of it! All these years was to bear the inevitable stoic. But now, I believe, has entered a hopeful situation. Mr Heinrich Wacker's proposal to remove the bridge entirely, then to vacant lots to conclude with a sense of proportion, I believe is right. I see before my eyes newly constructed frame houses, green areas with benches and children playing, are allowed on the lawn.
For the benefit of all security solution can not be found. Precisely for this reason should be given to the new route in all directions in order to agree and democratic, but also pragmatic, to achieve the best possible. Reasonable and environmentally friendly without doubt a bridge in the industrial zone. Here I am again at the words of Mr. Samsen, the man is a priority. This should also apply in future for the Trail. A traffic-free zone is long overdue. Urban planners who say otherwise, I can not take it seriously.
neighbors, as Mr. Ossig and Mr. Kleinschmidt, have argued in all my senses. An action I would concur. I inhabit a protected monument as a house that was renovated with high investment are Herzbblut and a lot of power. The Monument Protection Authority has strict requirements that had to be met. But when it comes to engage in the protection of old buildings, houses with a medieval foundation, caused by the current market shocks can not absorb, I hear and see nothing of this institution, around which the preservation of the framework sought to help. If they actually perceive their own best interests? Especially now that would offer a unique opportunity? Or she feels responsible only for cosmetic Conditions. If tomorrow I can put a solar panel on the roof of our house, would certainly provide for the dismantling! Where this authority will provide support and information in obtaining the energy from Jul 01, 2008 valid passport? It does nothing. But the only nota bene.
The demolition of the dilapidated bridge would provide a unique opportunity to finally give the historical landmark the necessary protection so that we have many more descendants of the town of Rotenburg, "the beauty of the Fulda, and brings joy to its visitors. The experience of urban design errors - like in the sixties - should be in the future groundbreaking.
Werner Herwig
Rotenburg
0 comments:
Post a Comment