How To Stop Cut Roof Of Mouth Bleeding

letter "Wittichbrücke" by Dr. Edith Therese Rangkuty

fragmented to the detriment of the citizens

It is certainly not expected that so many Rotenburger identify with their city and work for the preservation of its landscape and nature. A cry goes through the population and that is good.

The living and quality of life in the area of Wittichsteges would be significantly reduced by the construction of a bridge. Over the last few years there has arisen a compact residential area, where young and old feel comfortable. Thus, young families drawn specifically in this residential area, or have built there. They wanted the quiet location and closeness to nature, especially for their children. And those who have lived for years and days there and own property, were sure to have once made the right decision: a flat in a good location whose value provides security for old age.

All these people now see themselves alienated and wonder if you can it so as to deal with them. Uncertainty arises and for good reason: What happens to my property, if the bridge is? How loud and dusty, it will be then? Can be used by schools in teaching to the habitat in the future and where's the quiet footpath on the Fulda?

All the issues that concern people in connection with the proposed bridge, can ultimately be combined into one: Can the city so as to deal with us?

I think they can not and she should out of respect for the citizens either. It is not just about that existing planning law is respected. This is already mandatory. The point is, before Planning law is created to inform citizens about a possible project. It's about explaining and explaining, but mainly it's about one thing: How do the residents of the project and what feasible alternatives are there?

At a briefing on the integrated action concept "ZUBRA" municipal Bebra-Rotenburg-Alheim Mr. Geyer by the relevant planning office has a few weeks ago in Rotenburg Fuldaauen referred to as a jewel. These are a "unique position" of our city and as such a sensitive nature. With their help we could to the natural, rural Tourism develop very well.

Is this again smoke and mirrors? No matter, though the town of Rotenburg in the financing of the concept was instrumental? What is actually this whole piece of work, this fractured individuals projects that fit once again not to each other? Here is a sustainable concept - where a proposed bridge, not matching it. Here, almost for years before him hindämmernde planning a ring road with a bridge to connect to one of the few small commercial areas that Rotenburg has at all - there a planned bridge, not matching it. This listing of the fragmentation and piecemeal goes on and on.

there first parliamentary majority decisions in favor of the Wittichbrücke has to tilt the Hesse state government has no legal recourse for the decision. The reason for this is that it is the overall project is a local roads is

The use of the Rotenburg should not therefore come to nothing and shows the lists of signatures that not only the residents of the affected area to their city . ensure

Those responsible must now correct the consequences draw.

06/06/08, signed by Dr. Edith Therese Rangkuty